Evaluation of Medical Care for Diabetic and Hypertensive Patients in Primary Care in Mexico: Observational Retrospective Study.

Department of Research, Cancerology State Institute, Colima State Health Services, Colima 28085, Mexico. Department of Molecular Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colima, Colima 28040, Mexico. Molecular Medicine Laboratory, Academic Unit of Human Medicine and Health Sciences, Zacatecas Autonomous University, Zacatecas 98160, Mexico. Molecular and Structural Physiology Laboratory, School of Biological Sciences, Autonomous University of Nuevo León, Monterrey, Nuevo León 64460, Mexico. Department of Research, Mexican Social Security Institute, Villa de Alvarez, Colima 28983, Mexico. School of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico, 04510, Mexico. Fundación para la Etica, Education e Investigación del Cáncer del Instituto Estatal de Cancerologia de Colima, Colima 28085, Mexico. Universidad Anahuac Ciudad de Mexico, Mexico. Colima State Health Services, Colima 28085, Mexico. Subsecretaria de Prevención y Promoción de la Salud, Secretaria de Salud de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico, 06600, Mexico.

Journal of diabetes research. 2021;:7365075
Full text from:

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The present study evaluated the quality of medical care for patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HBP), and both pathologies (DM+HBP) within a public health system in Mexico. METHODS 45,498 patients were included from 2012 to 2015. All information was taken from the electronic medical record database. Each patient record was compared against the standard to test the quality of medical care. RESULTS Glycemia with hypertension goals reached 29.6% in DM+HBP, 48.6% in DM, and 53.2% in HBP. The goals of serum lipids were reached by 3% in DM+HBP, 5% in DM, and 0.2% in HBP. Glycemia, hypertension, and LDL cholesterol reached 0.04%. 15% of patients had an undiagnosed disease. Clinical follow-up examinations reached 20% for foot examination and clinical eye examination. Specialty referrals reached 1% in angiology or cardiology. CONCLUSION Goals for glycemic and hypertension reached 50% in the overall population, while serum lipids, clinical follow-up examinations, and referral to a specialist were deficient. Patients who had both diseases had more consultations, better control for hypertension and lipids, but inferior glycemic control. Overall, quality care for DM and/or HBP has not been met according to the standards.

Methodological quality

Publication Type : Comparative Study ; Observational Study

Metadata